Unless you're living under a rock, you've heard that Canada elected a new Prime Minister(PM), Justin Trudeau, this past Tuesday. Interestingly, Trudeau is the son of the a former PM, Pierre Elliott Trudeau who was often touted as one of the country's foremost intellectuals during his time in office. His wit and ability to play of the media was unlike any other; there may have been comparisons to JFK Jr, however I reckon Trudeau was the brighter of the two...anyways this blog post concerns the elections and recently elected leader. This was the biggest election in recent times - it even garnered international attention; that's big time! Canada rarely makes international headlines, however this election seemed to pique the interest of several different stations, including the BBC. Okay, I'll move on to discussing the actual election...
It seems whenever election season rolls around in the U.S, the media speculates who will be running two years in advance. I understand this has to do with advance polling and primaries etc., however it all seems so foreign when one looks at how elections are carried out across the border. In Canada, the influence of interest groups is not as prevalent, although it does exist...which makes campaigning a lot more accessible for the 'average joe.' A study would have be carried out to see what the average income is of the members of parliament and whether or not there is a stark difference with those in Parliament vs. the Legislature.
Stephen Harper, the former PM was in office for nearly a decade, and had been quite successful at maintaining a certain level of influence. Justin Trudeau was first elected as a member of parliament in 2008 for a riding in Quebec (Papineau) and re-elcted twice (in 2011 and 2015). Many critics have cited his lack of experience makes him unfit for the job, however politics is one of the fields where on the job training provides the most significant experience. Trudeau has been vocal about marijuana policies, climate change, leaving the American-led bombing campaign against the Islamic State, and restructuring economic spending. The greatest change has been in the tone, with emphasis on moving forward and positivity. This sweeping victory will show the world, (at least Canada) what vision Trudeau has in mind and if he can cast off his critics. It appears for a moment, the world has laid watchful eyes on a country that is often overlooked.
Friday, October 23, 2015
Thursday, October 22, 2015
Interview @ MIPP (w Dr. Erica McFadden)
If you have been following my blog, you should be somewhat familiar with my workplace, i.e. the Morrison Institute for Public Policy, if this is your first visit, welcome! As I am interested in education policy and aspire to work in the policy field post graduation, I thought it best to interview my supervisor who has varied experiences in the fields of the nonprofit sector and policy. Dr. Erica McFadden received her undergraduate degree from the University of Texas at Austin, with dual degrees in Business Administration and Spanish. From a young age, Erica knew she wanted to work in a role where she would be pushing for real change; her ideal job was a congressional lobbyist for the homeless. "In order to make change, you have to show what is working, you have to develop the research questions and drive the conversation yourself to show the gaps," stated by Erica. The paths in which we think we will end up in are often very different from where we actually wind up. This was also true for Erica, as she stumbled across the Morrison Institute for Public Policy by surprise while in the doctoral program (Public Administration and Public Policy in the School of Public Affairs). I am jumping ahead, before coming to ASU, Erica was working as a geriatric social worker and advocating for social welfare issues, she realized that in order to make impactful changes, it must come from within, i.e. policy helps initiate change. This monumental moment led Erica to eventually switch careers from the nonprofit sector to the policy field, where she decided to pursue her PhD at ASU.
I asked Erica what types of work experience or backgrounds most policy analysts had prior to coming to work at the Morrison Institute. I learned that staff have a wide variety of backgrounds, however journalism seems to be a common thread amongst policy analysts. Moreover, the job duties entail brief writing with public policy concerns which need to be addressed, speaking engagements about current research (whether that be on radio or tv), blogging, and interviews with local news agencies. Skills required include managing large workloads, meeting deadlines, analyzing, forecasting, researching and investigative skills. Finally, developing new questions for the research world and obtaining grant funding are useful qualities.
The Morrison Institute has specific focal areas including water, education, governance, economic growth, criminal justice, changing demographics and human services and health. Moreover, each policy analyst specializes in one (or more) of these areas. Erica has research interests in Aging and Disability (behavioral health), independent voters and the Citizen Initiative Review (governance) and privatization of services. Having specific research interests is integral to becoming hired by policy institutes/think tanks. Words of advice from Erica: to focus one's research interests and become an expert in your desired field, which also helps with in-depth analysis and becoming well-versed with the current language. This helps potential employers know you are up-to speed with developments. Knowing people in high places always helps. Co-author a paper with an academic, in an area of interest. Finally, present papers whenever possible, especially if you aspire to work in a think tank/policy institute. Keep in mind most people start as volunteers or interns, unless they have insider connections. Being able to make yourself indispensable to an organization will always work in your favor!
Some of the emerging trends or shifts in the field of public policy in the last 15 years have resulted in a swing of "worthy groups." Moreover, the reconstruction of aging has transformed (esp. as baby boomers have moved into the retirement phase of life). We are witnessing shifts in how we view the LGBT community and minorities. We are reconstructing "the other." Nevertheless, while society has become more accepting of people of non-Caucasian descent, we have been cutting social programs disenfranchising the poor, making it more difficult to seek education and more likely to become incarcerated. For extremely dependent individuals (i.e. frail and needy), there is little chance of success, as the state is unlikely to provide monetary support.
Finally, I asked what is the most rewarding aspect of working at Morrison Institute. Erica's response was having a finished product and being able to deliver a message to other individuals what we have done (getting the word out when a report has been published) is the most fulfilling aspect of this job.
I was curious to know how Morrison Institute can (better) implement their goals and ideas?
I was curious to know how Morrison Institute can (better) implement their goals and ideas?
By having more proactive events to lure people to become engaged. If the change agents, legislators are involved (the key individuals), and if policy becomes a priority this will help pave the path towards change – more people will become focused on that issue.
M.I will support specific goals and pulling in other states to create collaborative policies could create transformational change.
Thank you for reading!
Til next time~
Thank you for reading!
Til next time~
-
Friday, October 9, 2015
Fall Break
Living in Arizona I find the lack of seasonal change odd. I associate Fall with orange and gold leaves, apple cider or any warm beverage and crisp autumnal air. The temperatures have cooled down slightly, but sipping on a pumpkin spice latte doesn't feel quite right. Fall is undoubtedly my favorite season and this year I will be visiting Seattle to experience Fall in all its glory.
The term is nearly 2 months in and I find myself counting the days to ASU's "fall break." Does 2 days off qualify as a break? Don't get me wrong, I appreciate being given time off, but it appears to be a guise for a brief period where one is either getting ahead or catching up on assignments. Apologies for the rant...I look forward to a change of pace and scenery and especially the coffee! Like many in graduate school, my dependence on coffee has grown. Old habits die hard and I do not foresee myself drinking fewer cups until my program is completed. In other words, the coffee culture of Seattle will satisfy my cravings. Wishing you all a safe and enjoyable fall break!
Lodestar Day Resource Center
Hello,
In one of my earlier posts, I briefly touched on a series of surveys we are currently conducting. The results of these surveys are intended to change relations between city services, particularly the Phoenix Police Department and individuals with mental health issues. Last week, we revisited Lodestar Day Resource Center. The services provided by this non-profit organization are extensive: a Post Office, Legal Services, a transitional housing program and a "bag and tag"which provides storage facilities, including lockers for individuals to keep their belongings.
When individuals are homeless, everyday activities become obstacles. Homeless individuals face barriers in obtaining housing, finding employment and staying safe. In order to seek employment, applicants (usually) require a mailing address. This, coupled with mental illness, hinders homeless individuals from finding employment.
Lodestar Day Resource center is a transformational service that empowers individuals to end their homelessness. Shelters provide a temporary solution to a social issue that has deeper roots than housing alone. The organization recognizes the complexities of homelessness and seeks to embrace diversity and collaboration amongst clients. Ending homelessness requires a societal shift, by engaging the community to support actions to end/prevent homelessness may lead to holistic change.
In one of my earlier posts, I briefly touched on a series of surveys we are currently conducting. The results of these surveys are intended to change relations between city services, particularly the Phoenix Police Department and individuals with mental health issues. Last week, we revisited Lodestar Day Resource Center. The services provided by this non-profit organization are extensive: a Post Office, Legal Services, a transitional housing program and a "bag and tag"which provides storage facilities, including lockers for individuals to keep their belongings.
When individuals are homeless, everyday activities become obstacles. Homeless individuals face barriers in obtaining housing, finding employment and staying safe. In order to seek employment, applicants (usually) require a mailing address. This, coupled with mental illness, hinders homeless individuals from finding employment.
Lodestar Day Resource center is a transformational service that empowers individuals to end their homelessness. Shelters provide a temporary solution to a social issue that has deeper roots than housing alone. The organization recognizes the complexities of homelessness and seeks to embrace diversity and collaboration amongst clients. Ending homelessness requires a societal shift, by engaging the community to support actions to end/prevent homelessness may lead to holistic change.
Thursday, October 8, 2015
Career Services
Hello,
I am going back in time (May 2015) to revisit a pivotal moment in my graduate-school life. During my first two semesters of graduate school, I paid little attention to what lay ahead. Realizing I lacked experience in the field I desired to work in, I visited Maryjo Douglas Zunk, aka the career enabler. Yes, this is an imaginary term, however looking back at the encouragement and dedication Ms. Zunk has for students regarding career placement, it is not far-fetched.
One of the first questions Ms Zunk asked me was if I frequently update my LinkedIn account. Well that was a definite no, I had not created a profile. Ms Zunk walked me through various LinkedIn profiles and explained the relevance of LinkedIn in today's job market. Being able to effectively market one's skills and experiences are fundamental to the hiring process. Moreover, the networking aspect of LinkedIn is what has drawn so many users. The concept of networking used to aggravate me, however I've realized it is a part of our culture and I'm slowly working my way into the networking game.
I would like to credit Ms Zunk for leading me to find my first internship in Arizona. I feel extremely fortunate to be working at Arizona State University but more specifically at the Morrison Institute for Public Policy. Ms Zunk emphasizes the importance of career training, including prep interviews and resume building. Public speaking, particularly Toastmasters has also been highlighted. Leadership skills are often tied to how we communicate. I intended to participate in in Toastmasters this semester but found myself too busy; planning for next semester.
When it comes to career training and services, keeping oneself attuned to current trends can play a large role in attaining careers in public service. I am thankful ASU School of Public Affairs has such a generous career placement advisor.
I am going back in time (May 2015) to revisit a pivotal moment in my graduate-school life. During my first two semesters of graduate school, I paid little attention to what lay ahead. Realizing I lacked experience in the field I desired to work in, I visited Maryjo Douglas Zunk, aka the career enabler. Yes, this is an imaginary term, however looking back at the encouragement and dedication Ms. Zunk has for students regarding career placement, it is not far-fetched.
One of the first questions Ms Zunk asked me was if I frequently update my LinkedIn account. Well that was a definite no, I had not created a profile. Ms Zunk walked me through various LinkedIn profiles and explained the relevance of LinkedIn in today's job market. Being able to effectively market one's skills and experiences are fundamental to the hiring process. Moreover, the networking aspect of LinkedIn is what has drawn so many users. The concept of networking used to aggravate me, however I've realized it is a part of our culture and I'm slowly working my way into the networking game.
I would like to credit Ms Zunk for leading me to find my first internship in Arizona. I feel extremely fortunate to be working at Arizona State University but more specifically at the Morrison Institute for Public Policy. Ms Zunk emphasizes the importance of career training, including prep interviews and resume building. Public speaking, particularly Toastmasters has also been highlighted. Leadership skills are often tied to how we communicate. I intended to participate in in Toastmasters this semester but found myself too busy; planning for next semester.
When it comes to career training and services, keeping oneself attuned to current trends can play a large role in attaining careers in public service. I am thankful ASU School of Public Affairs has such a generous career placement advisor.
Arizona's 2014 Pilot Citizen Review
Welcome back!
It's official - I have been cited as a published contributor for a Morrison Institute report on citizen engagement. Back in August, I began researching factors that attribute to individuals participating in the community. I wanted to get a closer look on what inclines particular groups of people to become active members of their communities. The findings were not altogether surprising; individuals with high(er) socioeconomic statuses are more likely to seek positions on community boards and volunteer for various activities. Moreover, these individuals are also more likely to seek positions of authority, ultimately vying for political office.
Following in the the footsteps of Colorado and Oregon, the Morrison Institute created a pilot project, titled "Citizen Initiative Review" (CIR) during September of 2014. The idea behind this project was to gauge public opinion on a pension reform ballot initiative. Ballot initiatives are often confusing and difficult to comprehend - the majority of voters often tick off boxes without a clue of what they are endorsing or opposing. Twenty participants were selected to engage in a three and a half day deliberation over pension reform. Similar to a jury deliberation, participants did not vote on a final outcome, i.e. whether the reform should pass. Instead, all participants worked together to formulate a one-page Citizen Statement that included the pros and cons of the initiative to help other voters.
The Citizen Initiative Review intended to inform voters about a future ballot initiative, Prop 487, and did so successfully. All participants left the project feeling more informed and aware. Nevertheless, one of the key questions was whether individuals can change their opinions regarding policy issues and politics in general. Individuals generally tune out those with dissenting opinions. However, due to the format of the CIR, individuals began to listen openly to opinions that differed from their own. This resulted in mutual respect and understanding that having dissenting opinions/ideas does not mean people cannot reach a consensus on issues. Compromise is a requirement, but we can all have our voices heard? It appears unlikely that individuals will change their ideas when it comes to policy issues, however the willingness to listen has a significant impact on human relations. This is not unknown, however we often forget to see others as human.
If you are interested in finding further information regarding this pilot project, please check the Morrison Institute for Public Policy website in the coming months.
It's official - I have been cited as a published contributor for a Morrison Institute report on citizen engagement. Back in August, I began researching factors that attribute to individuals participating in the community. I wanted to get a closer look on what inclines particular groups of people to become active members of their communities. The findings were not altogether surprising; individuals with high(er) socioeconomic statuses are more likely to seek positions on community boards and volunteer for various activities. Moreover, these individuals are also more likely to seek positions of authority, ultimately vying for political office.
Following in the the footsteps of Colorado and Oregon, the Morrison Institute created a pilot project, titled "Citizen Initiative Review" (CIR) during September of 2014. The idea behind this project was to gauge public opinion on a pension reform ballot initiative. Ballot initiatives are often confusing and difficult to comprehend - the majority of voters often tick off boxes without a clue of what they are endorsing or opposing. Twenty participants were selected to engage in a three and a half day deliberation over pension reform. Similar to a jury deliberation, participants did not vote on a final outcome, i.e. whether the reform should pass. Instead, all participants worked together to formulate a one-page Citizen Statement that included the pros and cons of the initiative to help other voters.
The Citizen Initiative Review intended to inform voters about a future ballot initiative, Prop 487, and did so successfully. All participants left the project feeling more informed and aware. Nevertheless, one of the key questions was whether individuals can change their opinions regarding policy issues and politics in general. Individuals generally tune out those with dissenting opinions. However, due to the format of the CIR, individuals began to listen openly to opinions that differed from their own. This resulted in mutual respect and understanding that having dissenting opinions/ideas does not mean people cannot reach a consensus on issues. Compromise is a requirement, but we can all have our voices heard? It appears unlikely that individuals will change their ideas when it comes to policy issues, however the willingness to listen has a significant impact on human relations. This is not unknown, however we often forget to see others as human.
If you are interested in finding further information regarding this pilot project, please check the Morrison Institute for Public Policy website in the coming months.
Thursday, September 24, 2015
Morrison Institute: A Typical Day
Greetings,
By now I hope you're starting to get a sense of where my interests and passions lie. I would like to take a step back and revisit the Morrison Institute for Public Policy (MIPP). Whenever I begin a day at the Morrison Institute, it usually involves a strong cup of java. With that said, like many others working at nonprofits, there seems to be no typical schedule. I will however try to provide a picture of what a day may look like.
Normally, I start around 9:00/9:30am and work until 4:30/5:00 pm depending on the work load. Checking emails becomes priority number 1, after which I proceed with a series of phone calls to potential clients. These clients vary, sometimes we have applied for grant funding (funder), (potential) clients to take our surveys and agencies to work with us on current projects. Usually by the time I finish with this task, lunch calls. I am not one to work on an empty stomach, however there have been days, including today, where I have skipped the mid day meal. This is not something I am normally in favor of, however it sometimes necessary when deadlines are pending. After lunch, the day seems to pass rather quickly. Afternoons tend to be more relaxed, however in terms of output I find myself working best in the later afternoons (when the office is quieter). The pm involves emailing, editing surveys and can also include random activities such as meeting with Phoenix Police Commander Matt Giordano. I will refrain from discussing the details here.
As each day brings on a different set of activities, it is a little difficult to describe what I "normally" do. Hopefully this brief posting has made it more clear about my duties at the Morrison Institute.
Signing off~
By now I hope you're starting to get a sense of where my interests and passions lie. I would like to take a step back and revisit the Morrison Institute for Public Policy (MIPP). Whenever I begin a day at the Morrison Institute, it usually involves a strong cup of java. With that said, like many others working at nonprofits, there seems to be no typical schedule. I will however try to provide a picture of what a day may look like.
Normally, I start around 9:00/9:30am and work until 4:30/5:00 pm depending on the work load. Checking emails becomes priority number 1, after which I proceed with a series of phone calls to potential clients. These clients vary, sometimes we have applied for grant funding (funder), (potential) clients to take our surveys and agencies to work with us on current projects. Usually by the time I finish with this task, lunch calls. I am not one to work on an empty stomach, however there have been days, including today, where I have skipped the mid day meal. This is not something I am normally in favor of, however it sometimes necessary when deadlines are pending. After lunch, the day seems to pass rather quickly. Afternoons tend to be more relaxed, however in terms of output I find myself working best in the later afternoons (when the office is quieter). The pm involves emailing, editing surveys and can also include random activities such as meeting with Phoenix Police Commander Matt Giordano. I will refrain from discussing the details here.
As each day brings on a different set of activities, it is a little difficult to describe what I "normally" do. Hopefully this brief posting has made it more clear about my duties at the Morrison Institute.
Signing off~
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)