The Morrison Institute - An Insider's Perspective

Hello,
It's been awhile... hope everyone's term has been winding down on a high note.

I would like to spend the next little while discussing the ups and downs of the Morrison Institute. Let's begin with the strengths of this non-partisan think tank affiliated with Arizona State University. This institute makes a concerted effort in producing research that is bias-free and uses quantitative data analysis tools effectively. Moreover, the staff are versed in a wide array of areas, with each policy analyst having particular areas of focus. Whether working independently or collaboratively, several pairs of eyes review reports before the final edition is brought to print/the morrison website. It should also be mentioned the staff complement one another and this makes for an easy work environment. When it comes to training new staff and interns, individuals quickly learn the ins and outs of working at MI. This is an asset for not just the new staff,  but when deadlines loom, more individuals are able to work on the projects with pending deadlines.

As mentioned earlier, the staff are the core of this institution and ensure smooth sailing for projects/reports. In terms of any changes that could be implemented, if I were to lead an organization similar to the MI, I would seek more panel discussions involving the public to understand the concerns of local citizens. The event held by the Morrison Institute in early June on the potential legalization of recreational marijuana led to some lively discussions, and also shed light on how some citizens would be affected by this legislation. If the Morrison Institute and similar think tanks were to poll citizens and receive a significant proportion of responses (ballots filled out), this could lead to increased citizen engagement.

Overall, the Morrison Institute is able to capitalize on the staff's talents, which is integral to organizational success and growth. The organization allows policy analysts to seek their own projects, i.e. independence is encouraged and sought. The work environment is collegial. The change(s) I would incorporate are to find more ways to get the public's voice to play an active role with future projects. If we could find ways to attract more citizens to attend these events, citizens may be more invested in voting and participating in community events.